U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick proposed on Sunday that government spending should be excluded from Gross Domestic Product (GDP) calculations. The suggestion follows Elon Musk’s push for deeper budget cuts across federal programs.
Lutnick argues that removing government expenditures, such as military and social spending, would provide a more accurate picture of economic growth. He believes this change would help balance the federal budget, lower interest rates, and stimulate private-sector investment.
Policy Shift Raises Concerns
Critics warn that separating government spending from GDP calculations could distort economic assessments. Federal spending, including infrastructure, healthcare, and defense, plays a crucial role in economic activity.
A senior economist at the Federal Reserve, speaking anonymously, questioned the logic of the proposal. “Excluding government spending ignores a key driver of demand and job creation,” he said.
If implemented, this change could mask the impact of potential budget cuts. Programs facing reductions, such as Social Security and Medicare, might appear less significant in economic reports.
Economists argue that GDP serves as a comprehensive measure of economic output. Removing government spending could make it harder to track economic trends and policy effects.
Musk’s Influence on Budget Policy
Elon Musk has advocated for aggressive reductions in federal spending, particularly in subsidies and regulatory agencies. He argues that excessive government intervention stifles innovation and economic efficiency.
Musk recently called for eliminating multiple federal agencies, including the Department of Energy’s loan programs. His influence over the Trump administration’s economic policies has grown, with direct input on fiscal strategies.
Lutnick’s proposal aligns with Musk’s vision of a leaner government. The two have reportedly discussed strategies to shift economic power from public institutions to private enterprises.
Business leaders have expressed mixed reactions to Musk’s proposals. Some support reducing federal spending to encourage private investment, while others warn that budget cuts could harm essential services.
Potential Market Impact
Financial analysts predict mixed reactions from investors if government spending is excluded from GDP. Some argue that private-sector growth could become the primary economic indicator, leading to increased business confidence.
However, others warn that markets rely on comprehensive GDP data to assess stability. Removing government spending could create uncertainty, especially for industries dependent on federal contracts.
Bond markets may react sharply, as federal spending often drives demand for U.S. Treasury securities. Lower reported GDP growth could influence Federal Reserve policies on interest rates and inflation control.
A senior Wall Street strategist warned that changing GDP calculations could lead to confusion. “Investors rely on consistent economic data. Changing the formula could shake confidence in U.S. financial markets,” he said.
Political Reactions and Next Steps
Democratic lawmakers strongly oppose the proposal, calling it an attempt to manipulate economic data. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer criticized the move, saying, “This is an effort to hide the real impact of Republican budget cuts.”
Republicans remain divided on the issue. Fiscal conservatives support the idea, arguing that private-sector growth should be the primary measure of economic success. Others fear the move could weaken confidence in U.S. economic reporting.
White House officials have not yet confirmed whether the policy will be officially introduced. A Commerce Department spokesperson said discussions are ongoing.
The Trump administration has prioritized reducing government spending, and this proposal fits within broader fiscal policy goals. However, strong opposition could delay or prevent its implementation.
What Happens Next?
The Ukrainian military has vowed to strengthen air defenses around Kharkiv. Officials say new countermeasures are being deployed to intercept drones before they reach the city.
Residents should stay alert and follow safety instructions during air raids. Authorities recommend keeping emergency supplies and identifying nearby shelters.
The war continues to test Kharkiv’s resilience. While attacks persist, the city remains determined to rebuild and survive.
Looking Ahead
The Commerce Department is expected to present a detailed framework in the coming weeks. If approved, this change could redefine how economic performance is measured under the Trump administration.
Economists, investors, and political leaders will closely monitor developments. The impact on financial markets, federal programs, and economic stability remains uncertain.
For now, economists and policymakers continue to debate whether transparency or distortion will be the ultimate outcome of this proposal.
