Tensions between close allies flared this week as Germany’s Foreign Minister publicly condemned Israel’s decision to approve thousands of new housing units in the occupied West Bank. The rare rebuke from Berlin adds to mounting international criticism of the Israeli government’s settlement policies, which many argue are inflaming regional instability and undermining hopes for a two-state solution.
Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock didn’t mince words, stating that the expansion of settlements is “not compatible with international law” and directly contradicts the goal of lasting peace in the region. Her comments came shortly after Israel advanced plans for over 3,400 new housing units in various parts of the West Bank, a move that sparked outcry from human rights groups and prompted warnings from other European capitals.
Germany has long been one of Israel’s staunchest allies, often walking a diplomatic tightrope between support for Israel’s right to security and advocacy for a negotiated peace with the Palestinians. But Baerbock’s statement reflects growing frustration in Berlin over the increasingly hardline policies of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government, especially regarding settlement activity and its impact on already strained Israeli Palestinian relations.
The timing of the announcement has also raised eyebrows. With violence surging in parts of the West Bank and tensions running high in Jerusalem, many observers view the settlement approvals as provocative and politically motivated. Critics argue that expanding settlements not only deepens the occupation but also entrenches division, making it harder to imagine a viable Palestinian state in the future.
Germany’s criticism adds to the diplomatic pressure facing Israel from the West. The United States, while maintaining its close alliance, has also voiced concern over the pace of settlement expansion. European leaders are increasingly aligning on the issue, warning that continued construction in occupied territories erodes the credibility of peace talks and puts Israel on a collision course with international law.
Israel’s government, however, has defended its actions, stating that the new housing units are essential for natural growth and security in Jewish communities. Still, the backlash shows that even traditional allies are losing patience with policies they see as jeopardising regional stability.
As the situation on the ground continues to deteriorate, Berlin’s unusually sharp stance could mark a shift in how European powers engage with the conflict, not just with statements, but potentially with policy consequences down the line.
