Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick’s recent proposal to arm UK prison officers with firearms has been met with strong opposition from prison governors and staff organizations. Jenrick suggested establishing secure armouries and arming officers with Tasers, stun grenades, and firearms in extreme cases to combat rising violence from Islamist gangs and organized crime.
Tom Wheatley, president of the Prison Governors’ Association, dismissed the proposal as “headline-grabbing nonsense,” emphasizing that if lethal force were required, armed police support would be more appropriate. The Prison Officers’ Association (POA) echoed this sentiment, advocating instead for non-lethal options like Tasers and better protective gear.
Recent violent incidents, including a drone-smuggled knife attack on an officer at HMP Long Lartin and an assault by Manchester Arena bomber Hashem Abedi, highlight the severity of prison violence. Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood has already commissioned a review into officer safety, considering stab vests and taser trials.
Critics argue Jenrick’s approach oversimplifies complex security issues and could make officers more vulnerable targets. Whitehall sources also cautioned against the risks of introducing firearms in prisons.
In response to these criticisms, Jenrick has defended his proposal, stating that the current measures are insufficient to address the growing threats within prisons. He emphasized the need for a more robust approach to ensure the safety of prison staff and maintain order within the facilities.
The debate continues as the government reviews its policies on prison safety and considers the recommendations from various stakeholders. The outcome of this review could significantly impact the future of prison security and the role of armed personnel within the system.
