U.S. President Donald Trump has acknowledged that his claim of ending the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours was made with “a little bit” of sarcasm.He clarified in a recent interview that while the statement was not meant to be taken literally, he still believes a resolution is possible with the right leadership and diplomatic approach.
Trump has long argued that his negotiation skills could bring about a ceasefire faster than the current administration’s efforts.His comments come amid growing international pressure to find a solution to the war, which has lasted for more than two years and caused thousands of casualties.
A major development is now unfolding as Trump is set to hold a phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday.The discussion will reportedly focus on how to divide assets between Russia and Ukraine, including territorial disputes and key infrastructure such as power plants.
This initiative follows a ceasefire proposal from the United States, which Ukraine has accepted.
However, Russia has responded with specific conditions, stating that any ceasefire must address long-term security concerns and territorial agreements.
The upcoming talks between Trump and Putin have raised concerns among European leaders.
Many fear that any deal could involve U.S. concessions that might compromise Ukraine’s sovereignty or territorial integrity.
European Union foreign ministers recently met in Brussels to discuss continued support for Ukraine. The EU has maintained that a fair and lasting peace must be based on Ukraine’s full sovereignty and the withdrawal of Russian forces from occupied territories.
Despite these concerns, Trump remains optimistic that he can push the conflict toward resolution through direct engagement with Putin. He has criticized current U.S. policies, arguing that continued military aid without diplomatic negotiations is prolonging the war rather than ending it.
Trump’s approach has sparked mixed reactions within the U.S. Some Republican lawmakers support his call for an alternative strategy, while others believe reducing military assistance to Ukraine could weaken U.S. influence and embolden Russia.
Meanwhile, the Biden administration continues to emphasize the importance of sustained support for Ukraine.Officials argue that allowing Russia to dictate terms would set a dangerous precedent for global security.
Ukraine has also remained firm in its stance, stating that any ceasefire must not come at the cost of its territorial integrity. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has insisted that Ukraine will not agree to any deal that legitimizes Russia’s occupation of its land.
Russia, on the other hand, has signaled that it will not withdraw without major concessions.
Putin has repeatedly justified his military actions by claiming they are necessary to protect Russian interests and security.
The international community is watching closely as the Trump-Putin call approaches. Many are questioning whether Trump’s involvement will bring about meaningful progress or simply add another layer of complexity to an already fragile situation.
The outcome of these discussions could have significant implications for the future of U.S. foreign policy. With the 2024 presidential election on the horizon, Trump’s approach to Ukraine may influence voters’ perceptions of his leadership on global issues.
For now, the war in Ukraine remains unresolved, with both sides unwilling to back down. The world will be watching to see whether Trump’s intervention can make a difference or if the conflict will continue to drag on without a clear end in sight.
